Gun applicants in New York will have to hand over social accounts

Gun applicants in New York will have to hand over social accounts
Gun applicants in New York will have to hand over social accounts

Gun applicants in New York will have to hand over social accounts: Some of the municipal officials who will be responsible for assessing the content of social media platforms are concerned about whether or not they will have sufficient resources and question the constitutionality of the law itself.

New York state is implementing an innovative technique to examine people who want to get gun permits in response to the growing number of investigations into mass shootings that reveal missed warning flags. People who want to carry concealed pistols will have to turn over their social media profiles so that their “character and behavior” can be evaluated.

It is a strategy that has been hailed by a significant number of Democrats and national advocacy groups for gun control; but, several experts have raised reservations about how the law would be enforced and how it will handle concerns regarding free speech.

Certain municipal officials who will be responsible for assessing the content of social media is concerned about whether or not they will have the means to do so, and in some instances, they are questioning whether or not the law even complies with constitutional guidelines.

Peter Kehoe, the executive director of the New York Sheriffs’ Association, stated that sheriff’s departments have not gotten any additional funding or employees in order to handle a newly implemented application procedure. Despite the fact that applicants are required to name their social media accounts, he does not believe that local officials will necessarily look at them. He stated that the rule violates the rights guaranteed by the Second Amendment.

Kehoe responded by saying, “I don’t think we would do it.” “In my opinion, doing so would be a violation of the constitutional right to private.”

The new requirement, which will go into effect in September, was included in a law that was passed last week in an effort to maintain some limitations on firearms in the wake of a decision by the Supreme Court that the majority of people have a right to carry a handgun for the purpose of personal protection. Democratic Governor Kathy Hochul, who pointed out that shooters occasionally signal their intention to hurt others, put her signature on the document.

A growing number of young males, like the shooter who killed 19 students and two teachers at an elementary school in Uvalde, Texas, have been going online to leave hints about what they plan to do before carrying out a mass shooting.

In order to comply with the rule, applicants are required to present municipal officials with a list of all of their active and inactive social media accounts that date back at least three years. It will be up to the employees at the local sheriff’s office, the judges, or the county clerks to look over those profiles and determine whether or not applicants have made any statements that indicate potentially harmful behavior.

The bill will also require applicants to sit through in-person interviews, present four character references, undertake hours of mandatory safety training, and demonstrate that they have a proficient level of shooting ability.

Tanya Schardt, senior counsel, and director of state and federal policy for the gun control advocacy organization Brady, said that the law reflects how the Supreme Court ruling has shifted responsibility for vetting those who carry firearms in public to the states. Brady is an organization that advocates for stricter gun control laws.

Her organization stated that to the best of its knowledge, no other states require applicants for firearms permits to provide their social media identities.

The new strategy, on the other hand, is being implemented in the midst of a rising discussion around the monitoring of posts on social media platforms and the heritage of unwarranted surveillance of communities of color.

“The question that needs to be asked is, ‘Can we do this in a way that is anti-racist without also creating another set of violence, which is the kind of violence that the state commits when it watches people?'” Desmond Upton Patton, a professor at the University of Pennsylvania who specializes in social policy, communications, and medicine, and who also established SAFElab, a research effort examining violence affecting juveniles of color, made this statement.

“You’re also going to have to tell them your social media accounts because New York wants to thoroughly investigate you to figure out if you’re some of those dangerous law-abiding citizens who are taking the country by storm and causing crime to skyrocket,” Jared Yanis, host of the YouTube channel Guns & Gadgets, says in a video that has garnered a lot of attention on the topic of the new law. “What on earth have we become?”

Hochul, who has also tasked state police with routing out extremism online, did not immediately respond to a list of questions about the social media requirement. These questions included how the state will address concerns regarding free speech and privacy. Hochul has also tasked state police with routing out extremism online.

The question “How do we go about enforcing this?” is frequently the one that causes the most difficulty. James Densley, an associate professor of criminal justice at Metro State University and a co-founder of the research endeavor known as The Violence Project, stated. “I believe it starts to open up a bit of a can of worms because no one quite understands the best way to go about doing it,” the speaker said. “No one quite knows the best way to go about doing it.”

According to him, it is not always easy to make sense of the posts made on social media by younger people because they may simply be expressing themselves by sharing a music video.

“Where this will get complicated is determining the extent to which this is speech and the extent to which this is evidence of wrongdoing,” Densley stated.

The social media platforms Facebook, Twitter, 4Chan, and Parler did not immediately react to demands for comment that were sent to their respective spokespeople.

Patton suggested that New York could think about handing the work to a trained group instead, whose responsibility it would be to determine the most effective way to reach out to people online who are exhibiting signs of radicalization or trauma and may require assistance.

“There are a lot of nuances to consider, as well as difficulties that are contextual. We communicate in a manner that could be misconstrued due to our linguistic differences, as Patton pointed out. “I’m worried that we don’t have the proper people or the right tools in place to be able to accomplish this in a way that is genuinely helpful in reducing violence,” you said.

Adam Scott Wandt, a professor of public policy at the John Jay College of Criminal Justice, has stated that he is in favor of stricter gun control measures. However, he is concerned that the New York law may establish a precedent for the mandatory disclosure of social media activity for individuals seeking other types of licenses from the state.

According to Wandt, who instructs law enforcement professionals on how to conduct searches on people using social media, the law that was passed in New York is hurried and ambiguous.

“I believe that what we may have done as a state here in New York is, we may have confirmed their worst fears,” Wandt said. “I think that what we may have done is, we may have created a slippery slope that will slowly reduce their rights to carry guns and allow a bureaucracy to decide, based on unclear criteria, who can have a gun and who cannot.” “Which is precisely what the Supreme Court wanted to steer clear of,” you may say.

Related Posts